The Controversy Over Nick Gordon and Whitney Houston’s Money

Nick Gordon has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons in the past few years. The former boyfriend of Whitney Houston’s daughter, Bobbi Kristina Brown, has been accused of many things, including domestic violence, drug abuse, and even the death of Brown. However, one of the most controversial claims against Gordon is that he stole Houston’s money after her death in 2012. In this article, we will investigate the claims and try to determine if Gordon really did get Whitney’s money.

The Lawsuit Against Gordon

It all started with a lawsuit filed by Houston’s estate against Gordon in 2018, alleging that he had stolen more than $11 million from her during their relationship. The lawsuit claimed that Gordon had access to Houston’s bank accounts and credit cards and used them to fund his extravagant lifestyle, including buying expensive cars and taking trips around the world.

However, Gordon denied the allegations and filed a counter lawsuit, claiming that Houston had actually given him the money as a gift before her death. He also accused her estate of defamation and invasion of privacy, arguing that they were trying to tarnish his reputation.

The Legal Battle Continues

The legal battle between Gordon and Houston’s estate continued for years, with both sides presenting evidence and witnesses to support their claims. However, in 2020, the case took a dramatic turn when Gordon failed to appear in court for a final hearing, leading the judge to rule in favor of Houston’s estate and award them $36 million in damages.

The Evidence Presented

But the question remains, did Gordon really steal Houston’s money, or was he telling the truth when he claimed she gave it to him as a gift? To answer this, we need to look at the evidence presented by both sides.

Houston’s estate argued that Gordon had no legitimate source of income and could not have afforded his lavish lifestyle without her money. They also presented evidence of numerous unauthorized transactions and withdrawals from Houston’s accounts, including one for $11,000 on the day she died.

In contrast, Gordon’s defense team pointed to several documents, including handwritten notes allegedly signed by Houston, that they claimed proved she had given him the money as a gift. They also argued that Houston had a history of generosity towards Gordon, including paying for his legal fees and giving him a car.

Skepticism About the Evidence

However, many experts have expressed skepticism about the authenticity of these documents, noting that they may have been forged or manipulated. They also pointed out that Gordon had a motive to lie, given the large sum of money involved and his precarious financial situation.

There are also some inconsistencies in Gordon’s story. In one deposition, he claimed that Houston gave him the money in cash, while in another he said she transferred it to his bank account. He also admitted to having used Houston’s credit cards without her permission, which undermines his claim that she gave him the money willingly.

The Outcome

Ultimately, it is impossible to say with certainty whether or not Gordon stole Houston’s money. However, the preponderance of evidence suggests that he did, and that his claim that she gave it to him as a gift is likely false.

The fact that Gordon failed to show up for the final hearing suggests that he may have been trying to avoid further scrutiny and legal consequences. It also indicates that he did not have a strong case to defend himself against the allegations, despite his claims of innocence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while we cannot say for sure whether or not Nick Gordon stole Whitney Houston’s money, the evidence strongly suggests that he did. Despite his claims that she gave it to him as a gift, he failed to provide convincing evidence to support this, and there are numerous inconsistencies in his story. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to make their own judgment based on the available evidence, but it seems clear that Gordon’s reputation has been permanently tarnished by this controversy.